Please Note


Whenever you use the links on my blog's to make purchases, such as from Mystic Monk Coffee, CCleaner, and others, I earn a small commission. This commission does not have any effect on your costs.

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

North Carolina Governor Threatens to Veto Pro-Life Bill, GOP Responds | LifeNews.com


The following excerpts are from LifeNews.com:

  • North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory said today he will veto a bill that would hold abortion facilities to stricter limits if the state legislature approves it and sends it to his desk.
  • Abortion backers oppose the bill because they say other abortion clinics may not be able to comply and could be forced to close down. Planned Parenthood said its four centers may be forced to close. The bill passed the Senate, 27-14.
  • The Family, Faith and Freedom Protection Act would place limits on the funding of abortions by any health plan that received public money, would require clinics to meet more stringent physical standards, would require doctors performing abortions to be physically present during the entire procedure, would ban the possibility of sex-selective abortion and fine abortion practitioners for doing such abortions. It would also allow any health care provider to not participate in abortion-related procedures.
  • McCrory’s office said the Republican governor would block the measure from taking effect “unless changes and clarifications are made addressing our concerns.”

Read more by clicking below:
North Carolina Governor Threatens to Veto Pro-Life Bill, GOP Responds | LifeNews.com


Federal judge blocks implementation of new Wisconsin abortion law : News Headlines - Catholic Culture

The following excerpts are from Catholic Culture's Catholic World News:
  • A federal judge has blocked implementation of a new Wisconsin law that requires abortionists to have admitting privileges at a hospital.
  • Judge William Conley granted a 10-day stay on the new law, allowing time for abortion supporters to challenge the hospital-admitting requirement. The judge’s decision did not block a separate provision of the law that requires an ultrasound examination prior to abortions.
Read more by clicking below: